Well, my computer's been working fine but my creative juices haven't.
I've been going back and forth with this thing since last posting and haven't really progressed much. Like
d.sign suggested I'm having a lot of trouble finding things to add that won't take away from what I already have, which at the moment looks like this:
As you can see, I've been inspired by
anonyma's comments and decided to go with the concept of a large scale solar array, designed to be a 'landmark' project for the promotion of sustainable energy generation.
[RANT]
I personally believe one reason sustainable energy sources, (like wind and solar) haven't attracted large scale support from both industry and government, has been because it doesn't have 'technical sex appeal'.
What does that mean? Compare nuclear power and solar power.
Nuclear power requires exotic fuel materials, large and complex hardware systems and fairly advanced technical knowledge to get it to work, plus what you're basically doing is breaking atoms apart to make electricity.
Sounds very impressive.
Solar power requires you to stick wires into a slab of silicon and put it outside. If you want to go really hi-tech you add a mechanism to follow the path of the sun.
That's it.
Guess which method of power generation gets more attention, (and funding)?
The problem with solar power is that it's too 'simple'. I think that if you make solar power 'big' (literally) it will firstly get more attention, then more acceptance as a valid form of energy generation.
I also don't think it's a coincidence that in the last 20 years or so wind power has become widely accepted as a commercial method of generating electricity. That was around the time that turbines started getting
really big. Politically there's nothing like large-scale engineering to make it look like you're doing something.
Yes, unlike nuclear reactors solar cells can't produce electricity 24/7, which is a problem since electricity can't be stored on an industrial scale. I think that's mainly because there's never been a compelling reason to find a way to do it. Large scale solar generation, (and it's environmental benefits), could provide that reason.
[/RANT]
Anyway, any suggestions about taking the modelling further would be gratefully accepted. Texturing isn't my strong point so any ideas there would be very much appreciated as well.
d.sign: Maybe not infinite but it's pretty big. At full scale it's roughly 1.2 km end to end.
TheArchitect: Initial modelling took about 5-6 hours I think but it's been rebuilt three or four times since then, so the total time is anyone's guess. I looked through the contest rules too and I couldn't see anything about it
having to be habitable so I think I'm pretty safe there.
Thanks for your comments guys. Keep'em coming.